1. 19:05 14th Jul 2014

    Notes: 114293

    Reblogged from beatsblues

    Tags: omgso cute

    tranarchistbitch:


Very suspicious of people stealing his tail

    tranarchistbitch:

    Very suspicious of people stealing his tail

    (Source: tastefullyoffensive)

     
  2. 20:46 29th Jun 2014

    Notes: 187071

    Reblogged from gomer21xx

    Tags: omgkittenso cute

    (Source: rileyjanelle)

     
  3. 16:15 19th Apr 2014

    Notes: 29080

    Reblogged from beatonna

    Tags: !!!so cuteomg

    image: Download

    bluhamuhr:

look at this baby on his specially made baby horse

    bluhamuhr:

    look at this baby on his specially made baby horse

     
  4. isil-zha:

    1x05 - The Parliament of Dreams

     
  5. image: Download

    crownflame:

chaz-gelf:

sixmilliondeadinternets:

Gandhi has been historically the most aggressive character in Civilization due to an original bug in the first game that caused him to go all-out once he reaches democracy. They just kept the thing going ever since.


To further explain this bug, because I was chatting with mothmonarch about Civilization and other strategy games last night and I never got around to explaining this fully, but I love this story:
Gandhi’s AI in the original game had its aggression set to the absolute minimum (0 on a scale of 0 to 10, I believe, I may have this wrong but the basic idea I’m about to explain is accurate, as far as I can tell). Adopting democracy lowers an AI civ’s aggression by 2 points, so when someone who is fully peaceful loses two points of aggression, they should still be nice and polite, right?
Except this is an old DOS game, and so computer math is in place. What actually happened was that Gandhi’s aggression level ticked backwards two steps, from 0 to 255. On a scale of 0 to 10, Gandhi is now 255 points of pure nuclear rage.
And that’s the story as I recall it, but again I may have gotten some details wrong, so feel free to correct me! After that, as the original poster said, the devs loved the bug so much that they just kept it in as a running joke!

That’s fucking hilarious.

    crownflame:

    chaz-gelf:

    sixmilliondeadinternets:

    Gandhi has been historically the most aggressive character in Civilization due to an original bug in the first game that caused him to go all-out once he reaches democracy. They just kept the thing going ever since.

    To further explain this bug, because I was chatting with mothmonarch about Civilization and other strategy games last night and I never got around to explaining this fully, but I love this story:

    Gandhi’s AI in the original game had its aggression set to the absolute minimum (0 on a scale of 0 to 10, I believe, I may have this wrong but the basic idea I’m about to explain is accurate, as far as I can tell). Adopting democracy lowers an AI civ’s aggression by 2 points, so when someone who is fully peaceful loses two points of aggression, they should still be nice and polite, right?

    Except this is an old DOS game, and so computer math is in place. What actually happened was that Gandhi’s aggression level ticked backwards two steps, from 0 to 255On a scale of 0 to 10, Gandhi is now 255 points of pure nuclear rage.

    And that’s the story as I recall it, but again I may have gotten some details wrong, so feel free to correct me! After that, as the original poster said, the devs loved the bug so much that they just kept it in as a running joke!

    That’s fucking hilarious.

    (Source: halcy)

     
  6. candibakes:

    Dark chocolate-filled fudge brownies topped with peanut butter and chocolate ganache.

    (Photos by Cedric Bacon)